<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Check our headlines in your favorite feed reader</title>
	<link>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/check-our-headlines-in-your-favorite-feed-reader/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 19:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Mark Stevenson</title>
		<link>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/check-our-headlines-in-your-favorite-feed-reader/#comment-16291</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/check-our-headlines-in-your-favorite-feed-reader/#comment-16291</guid>
					<description>Here's a nice observation that appeared today on the Bogleheads page that reinforces some of Tom's succinct philosophy on comparing the stock market to inflation over finite time spans:

$100,000 invested in the stock market in 1961, including reinvested dividends, but corrected for inflation, would have grown to $100,960 in 1975 (14 years) or $129,500 in 1976 (15 years).

And of course, $100,000 invested in the stock market in 1928, including reinvested dividends, but corrected for inflation, would have "grown" to $91,300 in 14 years, $111,400 in 15 years, $135,000 in 20 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's a nice observation that appeared today on the Bogleheads page that reinforces some of Tom's succinct philosophy on comparing the stock market to inflation over finite time spans:</p>
<p>$100,000 invested in the stock market in 1961, including reinvested dividends, but corrected for inflation, would have grown to $100,960 in 1975 (14 years) or $129,500 in 1976 (15 years).</p>
<p>And of course, $100,000 invested in the stock market in 1928, including reinvested dividends, but corrected for inflation, would have "grown" to $91,300 in 14 years, $111,400 in 15 years, $135,000 in 20 years.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/check-our-headlines-in-your-favorite-feed-reader/#comment-16006</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/check-our-headlines-in-your-favorite-feed-reader/#comment-16006</guid>
					<description>Faye - 12 years? Yes. Do something else? No.

Tom Adams</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faye - 12 years? Yes. Do something else? No.</p>
<p>Tom Adams
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Faye Winkler</title>
		<link>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/check-our-headlines-in-your-favorite-feed-reader/#comment-15987</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/check-our-headlines-in-your-favorite-feed-reader/#comment-15987</guid>
					<description>I have some EE bonds most are 1988 and some are 1989  1 2000 I was thinking that the 1988's would be matured at 12 years after issue not correct? I didn't see the dates on those.  Should I do something else with these</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have some EE bonds most are 1988 and some are 1989  1 2000 I was thinking that the 1988's would be matured at 12 years after issue not correct? I didn't see the dates on those.  Should I do something else with these
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
