<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Civil suits and Savings Bonds</title>
	<link>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/civil-suits-and-savings-bonds/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Tom Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/civil-suits-and-savings-bonds/#comment-1991</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/civil-suits-and-savings-bonds/#comment-1991</guid>
					<description>Thomas - the lawyer at the Treasury didn't directly address the tax issue, but there's no reason the owner wouldn't get the tax bill rather than the recipient of the funds.

Svenson - Yes, that's what the Treasury's lawyer said. But you would be a strong person facing a weak court if you prevailed on that basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas - the lawyer at the Treasury didn't directly address the tax issue, but there's no reason the owner wouldn't get the tax bill rather than the recipient of the funds.</p>
<p>Svenson - Yes, that's what the Treasury's lawyer said. But you would be a strong person facing a weak court if you prevailed on that basis.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Svenson</title>
		<link>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/civil-suits-and-savings-bonds/#comment-1988</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/civil-suits-and-savings-bonds/#comment-1988</guid>
					<description>So if I understand you correctly, as long as you can prevent the courts from taking physical possession of the paper bonds, it is impossible to have them taken from you.

Is that right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if I understand you correctly, as long as you can prevent the courts from taking physical possession of the paper bonds, it is impossible to have them taken from you.</p>
<p>Is that right?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Thomas Beatty</title>
		<link>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/civil-suits-and-savings-bonds/#comment-1985</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 18:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/civil-suits-and-savings-bonds/#comment-1985</guid>
					<description>Regarding your reply about Civil Suits and Bonds, if someone's bonds were levied, siezed, and forwarded to the Treasury for payment, would the owner still owe taxes on the accrued interest as a result of the forced redemption? If so, that would be a real "double-whammy." Just curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding your reply about Civil Suits and Bonds, if someone's bonds were levied, siezed, and forwarded to the Treasury for payment, would the owner still owe taxes on the accrued interest as a result of the forced redemption? If so, that would be a real "double-whammy." Just curious.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
