<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FY-2006 Savings Bond investments double</title>
	<link>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/fy-2006-savings-bond-investments-double/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Savings Bond Alert #020: Savings-Bond-Advisor</title>
		<link>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/fy-2006-savings-bond-investments-double/#comment-316</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 16:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/fy-2006-savings-bond-investments-double/#comment-316</guid>
					<description>[...] FY-2006 Savings Bond investments double [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] FY-2006 Savings Bond investments double [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mario</title>
		<link>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/fy-2006-savings-bond-investments-double/#comment-298</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 00:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/fy-2006-savings-bond-investments-double/#comment-298</guid>
					<description>It's interesting that the percentage in TreasuryDirect is so low. I'm sure the government would like that to be a lot higher, to save cost on paper bonds.

The high investment in the first half of FY 2006 makes me think that the Treasury might not raise the fixed rate as high as we'd like, because they may not care in this case if savings bond sales fall of the earth for the rest of FY 2006.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's interesting that the percentage in TreasuryDirect is so low. I'm sure the government would like that to be a lot higher, to save cost on paper bonds.</p>
<p>The high investment in the first half of FY 2006 makes me think that the Treasury might not raise the fixed rate as high as we'd like, because they may not care in this case if savings bond sales fall of the earth for the rest of FY 2006.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
