<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I bond fixed rate 1.40%; EE 3.70%</title>
	<link>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/i-bond-fixed-rate-140-ee-370/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Tom Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/i-bond-fixed-rate-140-ee-370/#comment-324</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 16:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/i-bond-fixed-rate-140-ee-370/#comment-324</guid>
					<description>Sam - certainly the EEs are looking better than they did before. But the difference between the 3.7% EE rate and the 1.4% I rate is only 2.3 percentage points.

While inflation is indeed an "unknown variable," over long periods in the U.S. it has tended to run in the 2.5% to 4% range. So even at the low end of that range it looks like today's I bond should outperform today's EE.

My book includes an extensive look at historical inflation trends if you'd like to go deeper on this question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam - certainly the EEs are looking better than they did before. But the difference between the 3.7% EE rate and the 1.4% I rate is only 2.3 percentage points.</p>
<p>While inflation is indeed an "unknown variable," over long periods in the U.S. it has tended to run in the 2.5% to 4% range. So even at the low end of that range it looks like today's I bond should outperform today's EE.</p>
<p>My book includes an extensive look at historical inflation trends if you'd like to go deeper on this question.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/i-bond-fixed-rate-140-ee-370/#comment-323</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 13:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/i-bond-fixed-rate-140-ee-370/#comment-323</guid>
					<description>How high would the EE's need to be before you would consider them a better long term investment than the I bonds? Is a guarantee of 3.7% for 20 years a better bet than 1.4% tied to an unknown variable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How high would the EE's need to be before you would consider them a better long term investment than the I bonds? Is a guarantee of 3.7% for 20 years a better bet than 1.4% tied to an unknown variable?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/i-bond-fixed-rate-140-ee-370/#comment-320</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 17:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/i-bond-fixed-rate-140-ee-370/#comment-320</guid>
					<description>Dan - In the next edition of my book I'm adding some material on the benefits of tax deferral. It turns out you can calculate the additional annual yield you can get. It's highly sensitive to how long you hold the bonds and the regular yield of the investment and also a little sensitive to your tax rate. 

In my calculations I assumed your tax rate didn't change, which simplifies things. If your tax rate goes down before you cash the bond, of course, things are even better.

With a fixed base rate of 1.40% and an inflation yield of 3.6% you'd get about 5% composite. Tax deferral adds an extra 1% a year to that at about 22 years if you're in the 35% tax bracket and at 30 years if you're in the 15% bracket.

Of course if inflation ran higher, then I bonds would be even better than TIPS. If you didn't plan on staying invested that long, TIPS would be better.

And it's really hard to figure out how long you'll stay invested, because if rates continue to rise you'll be tempted to rollover your I bonds into new issues with higher base rates. I'm already getting questions about when that makes sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan - In the next edition of my book I'm adding some material on the benefits of tax deferral. It turns out you can calculate the additional annual yield you can get. It's highly sensitive to how long you hold the bonds and the regular yield of the investment and also a little sensitive to your tax rate. </p>
<p>In my calculations I assumed your tax rate didn't change, which simplifies things. If your tax rate goes down before you cash the bond, of course, things are even better.</p>
<p>With a fixed base rate of 1.40% and an inflation yield of 3.6% you'd get about 5% composite. Tax deferral adds an extra 1% a year to that at about 22 years if you're in the 35% tax bracket and at 30 years if you're in the 15% bracket.</p>
<p>Of course if inflation ran higher, then I bonds would be even better than TIPS. If you didn't plan on staying invested that long, TIPS would be better.</p>
<p>And it's really hard to figure out how long you'll stay invested, because if rates continue to rise you'll be tempted to rollover your I bonds into new issues with higher base rates. I'm already getting questions about when that makes sense.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/i-bond-fixed-rate-140-ee-370/#comment-315</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 15:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/i-bond-fixed-rate-140-ee-370/#comment-315</guid>
					<description>I knew the fixed rate would be 1.4%...

I was planning on laying off the I-bonds for another 6 months if it was 1.2% or below, or returning to my monthly purchases if it was 1.6% or above, so of course the Treasury had to make the decision difficult, lol!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew the fixed rate would be 1.4%&#8230;</p>
<p>I was planning on laying off the I-bonds for another 6 months if it was 1.2% or below, or returning to my monthly purchases if it was 1.6% or above, so of course the Treasury had to make the decision difficult, lol!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/i-bond-fixed-rate-140-ee-370/#comment-314</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 14:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/i-bond-fixed-rate-140-ee-370/#comment-314</guid>
					<description>I was hoping for at least a 1% rise in the fixed rate to make them comparable to TIPS and to compensate for the very low inflation component.

Treasury doesn't seem to be in any rush to get the fixed rates back to where they were before 2002.

Wonder if there's any political influence on this fixed rate? The bankers must like a low fixed rate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was hoping for at least a 1% rise in the fixed rate to make them comparable to TIPS and to compensate for the very low inflation component.</p>
<p>Treasury doesn't seem to be in any rush to get the fixed rates back to where they were before 2002.</p>
<p>Wonder if there's any political influence on this fixed rate? The bankers must like a low fixed rate.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
