<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US credit rating could drop within 10 years</title>
	<link>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/us-credit-rating-could-drop-within-10-years/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Tom Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/us-credit-rating-could-drop-within-10-years/#comment-491</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 17:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/us-credit-rating-could-drop-within-10-years/#comment-491</guid>
					<description>Mario - What you thought is what I thought. It's what we all learned in Economics 101. That's why the S&#038;P report is such a shocker.

To be fair, the report does say: "In reality, it is highly unlikely that governments will allow debt and deficit burdens to spiral out of control. Once governments are confronted with unsustainably rising debt burdens they do react, however reluctantly, by tightening the fiscal stance and/or reforming expenditure programs."

Nonetheless, fiscal responsiblity is a rational issue and we elect leaders for emotional, not rational, reasons. So the news from Washington is all about emotional issues like flag-burning instead of rational issues like fiscal responsibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mario - What you thought is what I thought. It's what we all learned in Economics 101. That's why the S&#038;P report is such a shocker.</p>
<p>To be fair, the report does say: "In reality, it is highly unlikely that governments will allow debt and deficit burdens to spiral out of control. Once governments are confronted with unsustainably rising debt burdens they do react, however reluctantly, by tightening the fiscal stance and/or reforming expenditure programs."</p>
<p>Nonetheless, fiscal responsiblity is a rational issue and we elect leaders for emotional, not rational, reasons. So the news from Washington is all about emotional issues like flag-burning instead of rational issues like fiscal responsibility.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/us-credit-rating-could-drop-within-10-years/#comment-490</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 14:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/us-credit-rating-could-drop-within-10-years/#comment-490</guid>
					<description>Possible bright side - maybe this will mean higher interest on Treasury securities to go along with the higher credit risk?  (not holding my breath...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possible bright side - maybe this will mean higher interest on Treasury securities to go along with the higher credit risk?  (not holding my breath&#8230;)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mario</title>
		<link>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/us-credit-rating-could-drop-within-10-years/#comment-489</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 03:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.savings-bond-advisor.com/us-credit-rating-could-drop-within-10-years/#comment-489</guid>
					<description>I was under the impression that the government cannot default on its loans by definition? Because they can always raise taxes and/or print more money? Or is this view too simplistic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was under the impression that the government cannot default on its loans by definition? Because they can always raise taxes and/or print more money? Or is this view too simplistic?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
